Public PolicyIn this short I shall discuss an overview of state of affairsmodernist and post colonialist ideologic frameworks . I shall then crinkle them with the modernist value roach originally concluding to explore my opinion in tell to the followers question : do postmodernism and postcolonialism commence any cast in the deem-up of current policiesBefore this brief discussion , til now , it is master(prenominal) to outline the commentarys of postmodernism and postcolonialism . The first postmodernism , centres on the spotment that no whizz facility of ideas beliefs or theories ar universal or still except that they argon constantly open to question and development . These postmodern ideas , theories and beliefs atomic number 18 also open to subjective commentary . gum olibanum nitty-gritty that any one p erson whitethorn befool a particular interpretation of the same constitution yet another person may have a whole different interpretation (due to differences in their gender , kindly shape , educational attainment `race disability or sacred beliefs etc (Cobb , 2001 Postcolonialism , however , refers to the after affects of colonialism (the rule and colonization of those that were not white , nor west (and in the case of post /colonial feminist movement - nor man . Through this pressure for the `subjects to change and acknowledge horse opera ideologies languages , behaviours , practices and religion (Christianity communities of commonwealth were forced to give up their national identities Through postcolonialism these issues have been revisited by those who underwent colonialism in an guarantee to restore their identity of origin Through postcolonialism , communities of people are utterance out through text , poetry and snatch most their identity : an identity that they have reclaimed (Young , 2001In relatio! n to postmodernism and postcolonialism have facilitated negotiations between countries and communities of people to develop global common policies . These negotiations set diversity serious and thus endeavour to attend to , and figure , the position of the `other community (Cobb , 2001 .
Within colonialism these policies are by and large developed and implemented top-down and by westerners on communities of people whom are not from western countries (Howlett and Rayner , 2006 . Through the 4 models explored by Howlett and Rayner (2006 ) we can also see how there are problems with plan of attack policy from o ne particular positioning in a global and multicultural world These four models understand the diachronic development of implementationThis position is in direct contrast to the modernist perspective of policy formation . This perspective views that as industrialised societies are more civilized than societies without industrialisation and capitalism , that they should so make the policies . Cobb (2001 : 8 ) deconstructs this issue by stating that : `By definition working on policy proposals for our society is a plastic occupation Hence this is a work in reconstructive postmodern thought . However fruitful construction cannot take show without extensive deconstruction of our heritage Thus meaning that in for us to move forward , we need to be able-bodied to work loose , or unravel , the invoice at heart which our ideologies are based . In doing this we can let go of the past and embrace new experiences , ideas and ways of macrocosm in the worldAlthough this...If you want to get a full essay, parade it on our website: ! BestEssayCheap.com
If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: cheap essay
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.